Comments on: 2008 Programming Language Plan

By: Lojic Technologies Blog · 2009 Programming Language Plan

Lojic Technologies Blog · 2009 Programming Language Plan — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:36:46 +0000

[...] 2008 Programming Language Plan didn’t go as well as I hoped, so I’m regrouping for another go at it. I did make some [...]

By: BRENDA VANVOLKENBURG

BRENDA VANVOLKENBURG — Sun, 04 May 2008 22:39:13 +0000

Hi,

Just learning, need to do a report on machine languages. My daughter and I are also learning in college together. She hates it, and get 90’s on tests. I love learning all kinds of new things and am getting as low as 70’s.
Do you have any encouraging words about the future with witch I can
inspire her with?

Thanks for your time

By: Brian Adkins

Brian Adkins — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:43:54 +0000

@notkoau I understand what you’re saying about ML & OCaml, that’s why they’re at the end of the list :) Thanks for the Forth & Prolog suggestions. I agree they are significant, but for some reason I simply haven’t developed an interest for either one, but I think when I go through Norvig’s PAIP a Prolog interpreter is one of the projects I’ll cover.

By: notkoau

notkoau — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:03:03 +0000

Nice article. :-)

If you learn both Haskell and Scheme, you kind of get ML for free, so I would drop ML (at least initially). Same goes for OCaml, which is quite similar to ML.

A couple of fundamentally different (and quite historically significant) languages missing from your list is Forth and Prolog.

By: koaung

koaung — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:58:20 +0000

thank a lot!
By reading your letter, I could know some programming languages
which I don’t know before; Perl, Ruby, Python.

I want to know about these programming languages news, please !
Have a good time for U!

KoAung.