<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lojic Technologies Blog &#187; html</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lojic.com/blog/tag/html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lojic.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Head First HTML with CSS &amp; XHTML</title>
		<link>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/07/14/head-first-html-with-css-xhtml/</link>
		<comments>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/07/14/head-first-html-with-css-xhtml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Adkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lojic.com/blog/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first noticed the covers of the &#8220;Head First&#8221; book series from O&#8217;Reilly a while ago, and I thought they looked unprofessional and simplistic, so I never really looked into them. Interestingly, I try to be careful about not being biased by nice book covers, but I think I&#8217;m more susceptible to dismissing books with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first noticed the covers of the &#8220;Head First&#8221; book series from O&#8217;Reilly a while ago, and I thought they looked unprofessional and simplistic, so I never really looked into them. Interestingly, I try to be careful about not being biased by nice book covers, but I think I&#8217;m more susceptible to dismissing books with &#8220;bad&#8221; covers.</p>
<p>I researched HTML books recently to help my aesthetically gifted wife get started designing web pages and the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/059610197X/ref=nosim/lojic-20">Head First HTML with CSS &#038; XHTML</a> title got great reviews on Amazon, so she picked up a copy.</p>
<p>I thought I&#8217;d flip through the book, and I ended up reading the entire thing :) I really wish this book was available years ago when I started coding HTML; it&#8217;s an incredibly well written tutorial. It has a very unique style which the authors spend quite a few pages explaining:</p>
<blockquote><p>Based on the latest research in cognitive science, neurobiology, and educational psychology, learning takes a lot more than text on a page. We know what turns your brain on.</p></blockquote>
<p>After reading the book, I tend to agree with their approach. It was a very fun and informative read. Most of the book was review for me since I&#8217;ve spent years learning this stuff the hard way, but there were a handful of excellent points I learned from the book, and I understand a lot of the foundational aspects of XHTML &#038; CSS much better than I did before. Expecting a newbie to get through a typical HTML reference book is unrealistic IMO.</p>
<p>For anyone wanting to learn the basics of (X)HTML &#038; CSS, or would like a good review, I <strong>highly</strong> recommend this book. I don&#8217;t know if the other books in the &#8220;Head First&#8221; series are as good, but I&#8217;ll certainly consider them in the future based on my experience with this one.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> I have found one thing to criticize about the book. The index leaves a lot to be desired. This is a particularly grievous deficiency with this book since it is organized as a tutorial as opposed to a reference book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/07/14/head-first-html-with-css-xhtml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which doctypes are being used?</title>
		<link>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/07/12/which-doctypes-are-being-used/</link>
		<comments>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/07/12/which-doctypes-are-being-used/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Adkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lojic.com/blog/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In trying to decide which doctype to use for my new web apps, I thought I&#8217;d see what other sites are currently using. Here are the results in order from least to most leading edge:
No doctype at all

mail.google.com
mail.yahoo.com
www.alexa.com
www.amazon.com
www.barnesnoble.com
www.ebay.com
www.godaddy.com
www.google.com
www.myspace.com
www.trianglemls.com

HTML 4.0 Transitional w/o URL

www.fedex.com

HTML 4.0 Transitional Loose

www.dell.com
www.microsoft.com
www.monster.com

HTML 4.0 Strict w/o URL

www.ask.com

HTML 4.01 Transitional w/o URL

www.bankofamerica.com
www.netflix.com
www.nuskin.com
www.ups.com

HTML 4.01 Transitional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In trying to decide which doctype to use for my new web apps, I thought I&#8217;d see what other sites are currently using. Here are the results in order from least to most leading edge:</p>
<p><strong>No doctype at all</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>mail.google.com</li>
<li>mail.yahoo.com</li>
<li>www.alexa.com</li>
<li>www.amazon.com</li>
<li>www.barnesnoble.com</li>
<li>www.ebay.com</li>
<li>www.godaddy.com</li>
<li>www.google.com</li>
<li>www.myspace.com</li>
<li>www.trianglemls.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HTML 4.0 Transitional w/o URL</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.fedex.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HTML 4.0 Transitional Loose</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.dell.com</li>
<li>www.microsoft.com</li>
<li>www.monster.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HTML 4.0 Strict w/o URL</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.ask.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HTML 4.01 Transitional w/o URL</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.bankofamerica.com</li>
<li>www.netflix.com</li>
<li>www.nuskin.com</li>
<li>www.ups.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HTML 4.01 Transitional Loose</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.apple.com</li>
<li>www.bizbuysell.com</li>
<li>www.craigslist.org</li>
<li>www.hp.com</li>
<li>www.sun.com</li>
<li>www.usps.gov</li>
<li>www.youtube.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HTML 4.01 Strict</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.flickr.com</li>
<li>www.slashdot.org</li>
<li>www.walmart.com</li>
<li>www.yahoo.com (for Firefox, no doctype for IE)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>XHTML 1.0 Transitional</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.aol.com</li>
<li>www.digg.com</li>
<li>www.expedia.com</li>
<li>www.livejournal.com</li>
<li>www.loopnet.com</li>
<li>www.orbitz.com</li>
<li>www.stumbleupon.com</li>
<li>www.wachovia.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>XHTML 1.0 Strict</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>del.icio.us</li>
<li>maps.google.com</li>
<li>www.blogger.com</li>
<li>www.facebook.com</li>
<li>www.ibm.com</li>
<li>www.jaiku.com</li>
<li>www.msn.com</li>
<li>www.pownce.com</li>
<li>www.twitter.com</li>
<li>www.wikipedia.org</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>XHTML 1.1</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>www.mayoclinic.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>There are enough mainstream sites using XHTML now, that I feel it may be ready for prime time. Since I don&#8217;t have a lot of legacy pages to deal with, I&#8217;m going to use XHTML 1.0 Strict.<br />
<code><br />
&lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"&gt;<br />
</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/07/12/which-doctypes-are-being-used/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Douglas Crockford: Theory of the DOM</title>
		<link>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/05/17/douglas-crockford-theory-of-the-dom/</link>
		<comments>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/05/17/douglas-crockford-theory-of-the-dom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Adkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lojic.com/blog/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a set of 3 videos by Douglas Crockford on the DOM that were in between his JavaScript and Advanced JavaScript presentations. Pretty basic material, but you may find a few helpful hints. A few comments:

Comment hack for JavaScript hasn&#8217;t been necessary for 10 years!
language=javascript has been deprecated
type=&#8217;text/javascript&#8217; is ignored if you use the src [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a set of 3 videos by Douglas Crockford on the DOM that were in between his JavaScript and Advanced JavaScript presentations. Pretty basic material, but you may find a few helpful hints. A few comments:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Comment hack</strong> for JavaScript hasn&#8217;t been necessary for 10 years!</li>
<li><strong>language=javascript</strong> has been deprecated</li>
<li><strong>type=&#8217;text/javascript&#8217;</strong> is ignored if you use the src attribute</li>
<li>remove any event handlers of a node before deleting it due to <strong>MS garbage collection incompetencies</strong></li>
<li>avoid <strong>trickling, bubbling</strong> is where the action is</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=111582">Theory of the DOM Part 1 of 3</a></p>
<p><a href="http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=111583">Theory of the DOM Part 2 of 3</a></p>
<p><a href="http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=111584">Theory of the DOM Part 3 of 3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/05/17/douglas-crockford-theory-of-the-dom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>35 Designers x 5 Questions</title>
		<link>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/05/08/35-designers-x-5-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/05/08/35-designers-x-5-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Adkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lojic.com/blog/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[35 designers. 5 questions. 5 precise answers. Result: 175 professional suggestions, tips and ideas from some of the best web-developers all around the world.
In the end weâ€™ve received more answers than we expected. The results &#8211; over 80 CSS-based tips, design ideas, suggestions, fonts, design-related books and online-magazines &#8211; are listed below. Itâ€™s interesting to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>35 designers. 5 questions. 5 precise answers. Result: 175 professional suggestions, tips and ideas from some of the best web-developers all around the world.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In the end weâ€™ve received more answers than we expected. The results &#8211; over 80 CSS-based tips, design ideas, suggestions, fonts, design-related books and online-magazines &#8211; are listed below. Itâ€™s interesting to know, how designers work their magic. Itâ€™s interesting to know what you can actually learn from them.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/04/20/35-designers-x-5-questions/">35 Designers x 5 Questions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lojic.com/blog/2007/05/08/35-designers-x-5-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

